November 06, 2009

How to have a Trans-Fat-Free Halloween! & Why Halloween is Corny


Picture from here

If you're looking to avoid trans fats, avoid the following candies, but feel free to partake in the second list.

Typical Halloween candies which contain trans fats (partially or fully hydrogenated oil):
  • Air Heads
  • Almond Joy
  • Baby Ruth
  • Butterfinger
  • Charleston Chew
  • Kit Kat
  • Milky Way
  • PayDay
  • Reese's / Reese's Pieces
  • Skittles
  • Snickers
  • Starbursts
  • Twix
  • Three Musketeers
  • Tootsie Rolls

Out of the above, Tootsie Rolls, Starbursts, and Skittles are probably the worst. Their main ingredients are sugar, corn syrup, and a trans fat -- partially hydrogenated soybean oil in Tootsies and hydrogenated palm kernel oil in Starbursts and Skittles. At least the others have cocoa as part of a main ingredient, and often, nuts, which are moderately healthy. (Moderately, because they're still swimmin' in sugar.:)

Out of the above, judging by ingredients listings, Almond Joy probably has the least trans fat per serving. Hooray?


The following are trans-fat-free, but palm oil and high fructose corn syrup are still possibilities. However, most of these don't contain HFCS, a pleasant surprise.

Typical Halloween candies that DON'T contain trans fats:

  • 100 Grand (does contain HFCS)
  • Blow Pops
  • Candy corn
  • Crunch
  • Dots
  • Hershey (plain)
  • Jolly Rancher
  • Jujyfruits
  • Junior Mints
  • Life Savers
  • M&M's
  • Pop Rocks
  • Peanut M&M's ("allergen warning: may contain peanuts" lol)
  • Sour Patch Kids
  • SweeTarts
  • Toblerone
  • Warheads

However, Crunch bars contain POLYGLYCEROL POLYRICINOLEATE, which is not really something you want either. (Google it.) That's ok, since I personally think Crunch bars taste like something Cap'n Crunch pooped.
As for gummis (gummi bears, gummi worms, gummi HAMBURGERS?! etc), there are so many different brands and they all have slightly different ingredients, so you're on your own there. ;)

Also, keep in mind that ALL of these candies are made from corn.Okay, that's not the way to say it -- they all contain ingredients which are DERIVED from corn. If you find that kind of thing interesting (I do).
But basically, corn, you guys. So much corn.

---
Go to ChocolateBar.com for delicious chocolate from Endangered Species, a company that donates 10% of its net profits to benefit species, habitat and humanity!

October 16, 2009

The Search for the Perfect Deodorant

Image from LuckyVitamin.com.

One day I looked at my stick of conventional deodorant and noticed that the main ingredient was aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex GLY. (Check yours, it's probably the same ingredient.) I thought this was quite a fancy and intimidating name, and then I thought about its purpose: "anti-perspirant". Wait a minute. Didn't we learn in health class that perspiring is GOOD for you? What are the implications of a chemical that suppresses a natural body reaction? (What it actually does is BLOCK the pores. This can sometimes result in cysts, which can worsen to a point where they have to be surgically removed.)
Scientific research hasn't figured that out for certain yet -- possibly because there is not enough interest, and there is probably pressure against such research by the pharmaceutical industry that wants to keep selling us these products. Consumers that think for themselves are dangerous, from a money-grubbing standpoint.
Although it is not 100% certain, aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex has been linked, possibly, to cancer (in particular breast cancer) and Alzheimer's disease. Aluminum compounds are a known neurotoxin and also thought to be a respiratory toxicity hazard (meaning a spray deodorant containing aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex is even worse).
For me, whether or not it's CERTAIN that it causes cancer or disease is not important; the possibility, plus the other implications of the product, are more than enough. One thing we often forget when using cosmetics, fragrances, and other "beauty products" is that everything we put on our skin -- even just the surface -- goes IN to our bodies. I don't know about you, but I don't want an aluminum compound in my body. Unfortunately, avoiding these compounds entirely is extremely difficult, since they are in tap water and processed foods. But at the very least, I could avoid deliberately rubbing it on myself, right?
Then there is the fact that aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex is an Anti-Perspirant. That does not sound good to me. The purpose of perspiration is to cool you down; your body wants, probably needs, to do it. We have adapted that response for a reason. What doctor or scientist would ever advise you to suppress a natural body function?
Thus began the search for THE PERFECT DEODORANT -- that is, an affordable deodorant without aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex, without propylene glycol, without anti-perspirant of any kind, and yet one that functions efficiently as an odor inhibitor.
I started at the Davis Food Co-op, where I went through almost of the deodorants marketed as "natural" over a period of about 8 months. Sadly, many of these "natural" deodorants contained propylene glycol, which might actually be WORSE than aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex -- it's a possible carcinogen (linked to cancer); has limited evidence of respiratory toxicity; classified as "expected to be toxic or harmful" on the organ system; has some concerns regarding persistence and bioaccumulation in the body; a classified skin irritant for many people; "one or more animal studies show reproductive effects at moderate doses"; and much more.
What's more, none of these so-called "natural" deodorants were as effective at odor control as aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex is. Some of them barely worked the length of half a day.
I had just about given up on my search when, about a month ago, I saw a little package on the top shelf of the deodorant aisle. It was called "Lafe's Natural and Organic Deodorant Stone". I had tried Lafe's stick deodorant and it hadn't worked. But this one appeared to be a stone of some sort? I was intrigued, and bought it.
And there the search came to an end! The deodorant stone is made of nothing but Potassium Alum, aka, natural mineral salts (think ocean). Potassium alum is often used in the natural dyeing of fabrics, as TheColorsOfNature.com could tell you. Instead of preventing perspiration, potassium alum inhibits the growth of the bacteria that cause the odor associated with perspiration.
It comes in two sizes, and is a clear, squarish stone with rounded edges. Each one comes with a little storage tray. The packaging is significantly less than conventional deodorant, which, when you think about it, is probably 90% plastic -- $6 for a big tube of plastic with a tiny cake of chemical deodorant in it! In addition, I've only had the stone for about a month, but I'm quite sure it's going to last a lot longer than the average stick of conventional deodorant. And buying less frequently means saving money!

Here are the odor tests that a deodorant must undergo to become The Perfect Deodorant, and Lafe's Deodorant Stone grades in the tests.
(A+ = No odor, A = almost unnoticeable odor that is undetectable unless a nostril is forcibly placed in the armpit, B and lower = some odor, F = AGGH!).

Lafe's Natural and Organic Deodorant Stone (3 oz)
12-hour Passive Test (Little to no activity): A+
12-hour Active Test (Moderate to strenuous activity, aka biking ~8 miles): A
9-hour 2nd-grade-Teacher Test (My mom. She bought a stone too, and loves it): A+
The Dustin Test (I made him sniff my armpits on multiple occasions, pity him. All in the name of science): A+

In addition, despite my body being used to having an anti-perspirant, I haven't experienced any noticeable amounts of sweat (which is very surprising) while using the stone, unlike with the propylene glycol products.
There you have it! Even aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex usually gets a C+ at best on the 12-hour active test. Get yerself one of these stone things. It's like magic.

Available at most co-ops and probably at whole foods stores. You can also purchase it at LafesNaturalBodyCare.com.

Sources:
CosmeticsDatabase.com; WiseGeek.com; http://dermnetnz.org/treatments/antiperspirants.html; personal research.

Say no to moo


CAFO cattle: Your cheeseburgers and steaks. Image from EPA.gov

This is why I'm not eating beef anymore:
The Hummer equivalent in food
"Simply switching from steak to salad could cut as much carbon as leaving the car at home a couple days a week."

(Don't worry, it's not graphic or anything. Just an article.)

Say "No" to other large mammals in your meals, as well, because they:
  • take up a LOT of space, and eat a LOT of food (rainforests are destroyed to make room for them)
  • create a LOT of waste (incredibly, more than people! well, if you've ever seen a cow patty... it's somewhat bigger than the average human poop)
  • are often forced to consume or receive food, antibiotics, and hormones that are inappropriate for them (especially cows and pigs) -- which ends up in YOUR body when you eat them
  • Do a google search for pictures from a CAFO, or "concentrated animal feeding operation", where is where your meat comes from (unless you specifically buy the rare kind labeled as not from a CAFO). You may feel differently about food choices after that. In addition, visit NoCAFOS.org to see the damage CAFO's do to surrounding towns, communities, and wildlife.
  • Large mammals such as cows and pigs are significantly more intelligent and receptive to pain and confinement than, say, a salmon.
Which isn't to say we should go around abusing salmon. But on an environmental and moral scale, if you want to eat animals, the smaller, non-mammalian animals are the way to go. Not just for you, but for the planet! (Oh, that thing we live on.)

Who's baffled?

Image source unknown. Travis looks overweight for a chimpanzee. :(


Travis the Chimpanzee:

1. Travis was fed "steak, lobster and ice cream". A chimpanzee's natural diet: Fruits, insects, sometimes plant matter, with occasional forays into the carnivorous realm.

2. "He brushed his teeth with a Water Pik, logged on to a computer to look at photos and channel-surfed television with the remote control."
He also could "dress" himself, drink wine, and use the toilet. He was taught to do these things by humans; these are not things he would attempt to do without human coercion. Chimpanzee natural behavior: Running around in the forest, climbing trees, protecting territory, mating, socializing with other chimps.

3. Travis was given Xanax, a human medication known to cause aggression. "Police said that Travis was agitated earlier Monday and that Herold had given him the anti-anxiety drug Xanax in some tea. Police said the drug had not been prescribed for the 14-year-old chimp." "Xanax could have made him worse," if human studies are any indication, said Dr. Emil Coccaro."

4. Travis had Lyme disease, which probably did not put him in a good mood. "...a tick-borne illness with flu-like symptoms that can lead to arthritis and meningitis in humans."

5. Travis was kept in a large cage inside of a house. Chimpanzee's natural habitat: Forest, away from humans.

6. According to this article, Travis had "previously run away and obstinately refused to [be] lured back", indicating that he was dissatisfied with his captivity.

7. Chimps are very territorial and will kill other chimps. It's likely that Travis saw himself as another "human" or else saw humans as "chimps". He probably recognized his owner as being primarily "his", and could quite conceivably have seen his owner's friend as a rival.

8. Chimpanzees have been known to attack humans, not just in captivity but also roaming in Uganda.

So why is anyone "baffled" by this attack? Horrified, sickened, and saddened, yes... but surprised? The most surprising aspect of this is that anyone would be so bold (see: stupid) as to think they could keep a primate as a household pet, and even to go so far (see: narcissism) as to treat the primate as a human and convince it to "act" like one.

Where have all the pollinators gone?


Picture by Darwin Dale/Photo Researchers Inc from http://www.hcn.org/issues/342/16891/image_viewer

First, the honeybees. You've probably heard about Colony Collapse Disorder, the name given to the mysterious incidences of honeybee deaths. Scientists don't really have any idea why it's happening, yet. Bees are the sexy little storks of the ecosytem, carrying packets of love to keep the flowers blooming into more flowers. They're extremely important, especially if you like fruits and nuts. (You may have noticed a rise in almond prices.) I find the part about bees being given high fructose corn syrup very disturbing.

I just read about another important creature in the line of pollination which is also "mysteriously" dying off in great numbers -- Bats.
They haven't figured out why that's happening either. Bats are important because they eat the pests that can destroy crops, and carry seeds in their guano.
I'm convinced it has to do with our unhealthy agricultural practices and general way of life -- pesticides (which would be in the pests that the bats eat), antibiotics, toxins, pollution, particulates, giving honeybees HFCS (seriously, WTF).

I tried to find out if any other pollinator/pest-eater species are "mysteriously" dying off like this, but Google just kept giving me articles about microbiologists dying, Edgar Allan Poe, and L. Ron Hubbard. Anyone else heard anything? (about mysterious species deaths, not L. Ron Hubbard.)